Why trial coppice in an SAC as opposed to another woodland? Asks Ed Lewis, following from Part 1- ‘Would coppice in Scotland’s SACs support threatened invertebrates?’
Taynish & Knapdale Woods (TKW) is a sessile Oak SAC within Argyll (NR 80722 86379). It contains ∼ 400 ha of broadleaved woodland, some of which has historically been used for coppice (SNH, 2010).
Neglected coppices are often of low biodiversity quality (Mason & MacDonalid, 2002), and TKW contains many species that would beneﬁt from coppice, the rarest being the Marsh Fritillary, found in only three SACs in Scotland (JNCC, 2004). This robust knowledge of what inhabits SAC woodlands would make a trial of the eﬃcacy of coppice more precise than using a private woodland not managed speciﬁcally for conservation. TKW is a Biosphere Reserve, designed to be a living laboratory for integrated management practices (SNH, 2007). The potential economic stimulus from coppice could create some resilience from external funding for conservation (Sanderson & Prendergast, 2002).
Coppice is strongly aﬀected by over-grazing (Cooke & Farrel, 2001;Palmer, et al. 2004; Ratcliﬀe, 1992), and to be eﬀective would require fencing. Furthermore, sessile Oak woods in particular support rare bryophytes and lichens. If undertaken at a small spatial scale (See Figure 4) the impacts of coppice have shown to be insigniﬁcant for lichens (Coppins, 2010; Giordon, 2012; Hodgson, et al. 2009). It has even shown to be beneﬁcial to epiphytes (Humphrey, 2002), mammals (Gurnell, Hicks & Whitbread, 1992), birds (Amar, et al. 2006; Fuller & Rotherey, 2013; Hewson & Noble, 2008), and plants (Chaideftou, et al. 2011; Van Calster, et al. 2008).
This essay is not proposing coppice in all SAC woodlands, of Scotland’s ten woodland SAC categories, three have the correct species to coppice: Sessile Oak woods, Tilio – Acerion woods and Alnus – Fraxinus woods. These three form 33% of all of Scotland’s SACs. Of these, sessile oak woods, like TKW, are the most suitable, notwithstanding because they are on average 3542 ha, where a 10 ha coppice trial would have minimal disturbance.
Figure 4: Ten 1 ha stands would only require 2.5% of TKW’s deciduous woodland. An understorey of hazel with oak standards providing a 30% canopy and coppiced on a ten year rotation would be suitable (Harmer, 2004; Hernando, 2010). Using ten stands mean there is a gradual successional gradient for niche species, moving anticlockwise (red arrow).
In summation, coppicing creates the conditions to vastly diversify the UK BAP population of SAC woodlands, especially during the early rotation. Coppicing clearly disproportionately beneﬁts speciﬁc clades, such as Lepidoptera, and the eﬃcacy of coppice on butterﬂy conservation is seen as a major method of reducing species decline. Conservation coppice does not aim to create small wooded islands of exceptional diversity, but rather increase landscape scale biodiversity through increasing the heterogeneity of the woodland.
Using a ten year rotation, and a succession of stands means the distinct UK BAP species of each rotational stage can be supported. Invertebrates are also only one community of a larger ecosystem, there are UK BAP species of other clades, especially birds, that are also dependent on the conditions coppice creates. Coppice is a traditional woodland practice, not requiring much land, or management, with its feasibility being proven both in the UK and further abroad. The multi-faceted beneﬁts, both ecological, social and economic make it theoretically very appealing in speciﬁc woodlands. This essay would conclude therefore, that it certainly warrants a trial in Scotland’s SACs.
Written by Edward Lewis, Univeristy of Edinburgh,
Cover Image: Gilles San Martin
Adamson R.S. (1912). An ecological study of a Cambridgeshire woodland. Journal of the Linnaean Society (Botany) 40: 339387.
Anderson, M. L. (1967). A History of Scottish Forestry: From the Industrial Revolution to modern times (Vol. 2). Nelson.
Amar, A., Hewson, C. M., Thewlis, R. M., Smith, K. W., Fuller, R. J., Lindsell, J. A., … & MacDonald,
M. A. (2006). What’s happening to our woodland birds? Long-term changes in the populations of woodland birds. BTO Research report, 169.
BAP, U. (2010). UK Biodiversity Action Plan. List of priority species: www. ukbap. org. uk.
Barnes, R. S. K., Calow, P., & Olive, P. J. (1993). The invertebrates: a new synthesis (No. Ed. 2). Blackwell Scientiﬁc Publications Ltd.
Barsoum, N., Fuller, L., Ashwood, F., Reed, K., Bonnet-Lebrun, A. S., & Leung, F. (2013). Ground-dwelling spider (Araneae) and carabid beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) community assemblages in mixed and monoculture stands of oak (Quercus robur L. Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) and Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris L.). Forest Ecology and Management.
Benes, J., Cizek, O., Dovala, J. & Konvicka, M. (2006) Intensive game keeping, coppicing and butterﬂies:
the story of Milovicky Wood, Czech Republic. Forest Ecology and Management, 237, 353365.
Bouget, C., & Duelli, P. (2004). The eﬀects of windthrow on forest insect communities: a literature review. Biological Conservation, 118(3), 281-299
Broome, A., Clarke, S., Peace, A., & Parsons, M. (2011). The eﬀect of coppice management on moth assemblages in an English woodland. Biodiversity and Conservation, 20(4), 729-749.
Burns, F., Eaton, M. A., Gregory, R. D., Al Fulaij, N., August, T., Biggs, J., … & Wynde, R. (2013). State of nature.
Chaideftou, E., Thanos, C. A., Bergmeier, E., Kallimanis, A. S., & Dimopoulos, P. (2011). The herb layer restoration potential of the soil seed bank in an overgrazed oak forest. J Biol Res, 15, 47-57.
CCGC, 2011. Management Plan for North Pembrokeshire Woodlands Special Area of Conservation. Accessed at: http://www.ccgc.gov.uk
Cooke, A. S., & Farrell, L. (2001). Impact of muntjac deer (Muntiacus reevesi) at Monks Wood National Nature Reserve, Cambridgeshire, eastern England. Forestry, 74(3), 241-250.
Dolek, M., Freese-Hager, A., Bussler, H., Floren, A., Liegl, A., & Schmidl, J. (2009). Ants on oaks: eﬀects of forest structure on species composition. Journal of Insect Conservation, 13(4), 367-375.
Donisthorpe, H. St. JK 1927. British ants, 29.
Ellis, C. J., & Coppins, B. J. (2010). Partitioning the role of climate, pollution and old-growth woodland in the composition and richness of lichen epiphytes in Scotland. Lichenologist, 42(5), 601-614.
European Commission. (2011). Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. (1992) In Ecology and Management of Coppice Woodlands (pp. 306-312). Springer Netherlands.
Fartmann, T., Mller, C., & Poniatowski, D. (2013). Eﬀects of coppicing on butterﬂy communities of woodlands. Biological Conservation, 159, 396-404.
Floren, A., Schmidl, J., 2008. Introduction: Canopy arthropod research in Europe. In: Floren, A., Schmidl, J.
(Eds.), Canopy Arthropod Research in Europe. Bioform Entomology, Nuremberg, pp. 1320.
Forestry Commission. (2011). The Scottish Forestry Strategy: 2011-2014. Implementation Plan & 2010-2011 Progress Report.
Fuller, R. J. (2013). Searching for biodiversity gains through woodfuel and forest management. Journal of Applied Ecology.
Fuller, R.J. & Rothery, P. (2013) Temporal consistency in ﬁne-scale habitat relationships of woodland birds during a period of habitat deterioration. Forest Ecology and Management, 289, 164174.
Fuller, R. J., & Warren, M. S. (1993). Coppiced woodlands: their management for wildlife. Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
Giordani, P. (2012). Assessing the eﬀects of forest management on epiphytic lichens in coppiced forests using diﬀerent indicators. Plant Biosystems-An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 146(3), 628-637.
Greatorex-Davies, J. N., & Marrs, R. H. (1992). The quality of coppice woods as habitats for invertebrates. In Ecology and Management of Coppice Woodlands (pp. 271-296). Springer Netherlands.
Grove, S.J., (2002). Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33, 123.
Gurnell, J., Hicks, M., & Whitbread, S. (1992). The eﬀects of coppice management on small mammal populations. In Ecology and management of coppice woodlands (pp. 213-232). Springer Netherlands.
Habitats Directive. (1992). Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and ﬂora. Brussels, Belgium.
Hawes, C., Evans, H. F., & Stewart, A. J. (2013). Interference competition, not predation, explains the negative association between wood ants (Formica rufa) and abundance of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Ecological Entomology.
Harmer, R. (1995). Management of coppice stools. Research Information Note-Forestry Authority Research Division.
Harmer, R., & Howe, J. (2003). The silviculture and management of coppice woodlands. Forestry Commission.
Hernando, A., Tejera, R., Velzquez, J., & Nez, M. V. (2010). Quantitatively deﬁning the conservation status of Natura 2000 forest habitats and improving management options for enhancing biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(8), 2221-2233.
Hewson, C. M., & Noble, D. G. (2009). Population trends of breeding birds in British woodlands over a 32 year period: relationships with food, habitat use and migratory behaviour. Ibis, 151(3), 464-486.
Hill, D., Roberts, P., & Stork, N. (1990). Densities and biomass of invertebrates in stands of rotationally managed coppice woodland. Biological conservation, 51(3), 167-176.
Hochkirch, A., Schmitt, T., Beninde, J., Hiery, M., Kinitz, T., Kirschey, J., … & Proelss, A. (2013). Europe needs a new vision for a Natura 2020 network. Conservation Letters.
Hodgson, J.A., Moilanen, A., Bourn, N.A.D., Bulman, C.R. & Thomas, C.D. (2009) Managing successional species: modelling the dependence of heath fritillary populations on the spatial distribution of woodland management. Biological Conservation, 142, 27432751.
Hopkins, J.J. & Kirby, K.J. (2007) Ecological change in British broadleaved woodland since 1947. Ibis, 149 (Suppl. 2), 2940.
Humphrey, J. W., Davey, S., Peace, A. J., Ferris, R., & Harding, K. (2002). Lichens and bryophyte communities of planted and semi-natural forests in Britain: the inﬂuence of site type, stand structure and deadwood. Biological Conservation, 107(2), 165-180.
JNCC (2004). Common Standards Monitoring Guidance for Woodland Habitats.
Keith, S.A., Newton, A.C., Morecroft, M.D., Bealey, C.E. & Bullock J.M. (2009) Taxonomic homogenization of woodland plant communities over 70 years. Proceedings of the Royal Society B
Mason, C. F., & MacDonald, S. M. (2002). Responses of ground ﬂora to coppice management in an English woodland a study using permanent quadrats. Biodiversity & Conservation, 11(10), 1773-1789.
Morecroft, M. D., Taylor, M. E., & Oliver, H. R. (1998). Air and soil microclimates of deciduous woodland compared to an open site. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 90(1-2), 141-156.
Nicolai, V., (1993). The Arthropod Fauna on the Bark of Deciduous and Coniferous Trees in aMixed Forest, vol. 16. Spixiana, Itasca State Park, MN, USA, pp. 6169.
Oxbrough, A., French, V., Irwin, S., Kelly, T. C., Smiddy, P., & OHalloran, J. (2012). Can mixed species stands enhance arthropod diversity in plantation forests?. Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 11-18.
Palmer, S. C. F., Mitchell, R. J., Truscott, A. M., & Welch, D. (2004). Regeneration failure in Atlantic oakwoods: the roles of ungulate grazing and invertebrates. Forest Ecology and Management, 192(2), 251-265.
Pautasso, M., Aas, G., Queloz, V. & Holdenrieder, O. (2013) European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) dieback a conservation biology challenge. Biological Conservation, 158, 3749.
Peterken, (1992) In Ecology and Management of Coppice Woodlands (pp. 306-312). Springer Netherlands. Peterken, G. F. (1996). Natural woodland: ecology and conservation in northern temperate regions. Cambridge University Press.
Pryor, S,. Peterken, G., (2001) Protected Forest Areas of the UK. A report for WWF & The Forestry Commission by the Oxford Forestry Institute. Oxford.
Pucci, T., 2008. A comparison of the parasitic wasps (Hymenoptera) at elevated versus ground yellow pan traps in a beech-maple forest. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 17, 116123.
Quine, C.P., Cahalan, C., Hester, A., Humphrey, J., Kirby, K., Moﬀat, A.& Valatin, G. (2011) Chapter 8 -Woodlands. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
Rackham, O. (1990). Trees and woodland in the British landscape (No. Ed. 2). JM Dent & Sons Ltd..
Ratcliﬀe, P. R. (1992). The interaction of deer and vegetation in coppice woods. In Ecology and management of coppice woodlands (pp. 233-245). Springer Netherlands.
Rodwell, J.S., 1992. British Plant Communities, 3. Grassland and Montane Communities. Cambridge University
Sanderson, H. & Prendergast, H. (2002) Commercial uses of wild and traditionally managed plants in England and Scotland. Unpublished Research Report (RBG, CA, English Nature, SNH)
Sansum, P. (2005). Argyll oakwoods: Use and ecological change, 1000 to 2000 ADa palynological-historical investigation. Transactions and Proceedings of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh and Botanical Society of Edinburgh Transactions, 57(1-2), 83-97.
Seifert, B., 2008. The ants of Central European tree canopies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)an underestimated population? In: Floren, A., Schmidl, J. (Eds.), Canopy Arthropod Research in Europe. Bioform Entomology, Nuremberg, pp. 157173.
Smout, T. C. (2006). The Pinewoods and human use, 16001900. Forestry, 79(3), 341-349.
SNH, 2005. Glen Nant National Nature Reserve. The Reserve Story. Accessed: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/GlenNantReserve SNH, 2007. The Reserve Plan for Taynish National Nature Reserve 2008 – 2014.Accessed at: http://www.nnr-scotland.org.uk/taynish/management/
SNH, 2008. The Reserve Plan for Inchailloch, Loch Lomond National Nature Reserve. 2008b. The Proposals for Ariundle Oakwood National Nature Reserve 2009 – 2015.
SNH, (2013). The proportion of Scotland’s Sites in Favourable Status
Smout, C. (2006). Oak as a commercial crop in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Botanical Journal of Scotland 57, 107-114.
Spitzer, L., Konvicka, M., Benes, J., Tropek, R., Tuf, I.H. & Tufova, J. (2008) Does closure of traditionally managed open woodlands threaten epigeic invertebrates? Eﬀects of coppicing and high deer densities. Biological Conservation, 141, 827837.
Summerville, K. S., & Crist, T. O. (2008). Structure and conservation of lepidopteran communities in managed forests of northeastern North America: a review 1. The Canadian Entomologist, 140(4), 475-494.
Swanson, M.E., Franklin, J.F., Beschta, R.L., Crisafulli, C.M., DellaSala, D.A., Hutto, R.L., Lindenmayer, D.B.
& Swanson, F.J. (2011) The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 117125.
Ulyshen, M. D. (2011). Arthropod vertical stratiﬁcation in temperate deciduous forests: Implications for conservation-oriented management. Forest Ecology and Management, 261(9), 1479-1489.
Van Calster, H., Baeten, L., Verheyen, K., De Keersmaeker, L., Dekeyser, S., Rogister, J.E. & Hermy, M. (2008) Diverging eﬀects of overstorey conversion scenarios on the understorey vegetation in a former coppice-with -standards forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 256, 519528.
Waring P, Townsend M (2009) Field guide to the moths of Great Britain and Ireland, 2nd edn. British Wildlife Publishing, Gillingham
Welch, R. C. (1969). Coppicing and its eﬀect on woodland invertebrates. Devon Trust for Nature Conservation, 22, 969-973.
Whittaker, R. J., Triantis, K. A., & Ladle, R. J. (2008). A general dynamic theory of oceanic island biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 35(6), 977-994.
Woodley, S., Bertzky, B., Crawhall, N., Dudley, N., Londoo, J. M., MacKinnon, K., … & Sandwith, T. (2012).
Meeting Aichi target 11: what does success look like for protected area systems. Parks, 18(1), 23-36.
Ziesche, T., Roth, A., (2007). Is the age of forest habitats aﬀecting the reproductive rate of generalist predatory ground beetle species? Commun. Ecol. 8, 183194.
Ziesche, T.M., Roth, M., (2008). Inﬂuence of environmental parameters on small-scale distribution of soil-dwelling spiders in forests: what makes the diﬀerence, tree species or microhabitat? For. Ecol. Manage. 255, 738752.